SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT
    Decision Information

Docket Number:  
FD_35035_0

Case Title:  
ADRIAN & BLISSFIELD RAIL ROAD COMPANY-ACQUISITION AND OPERATION EXEMPTION-TECUMSEH BRANCH CONNECTING RAILROAD COMPANY

Decision Type:  
Notice Of Exemption

Deciding Body:  
Director Of Proceedings

    Decision Summary

Decision Notes:  
PROVIDED NOTICE THAT ADRIAN & BLISSFIELD RAIL ROAD COMPANY FILED A NOTICE OF EXEMPTION TO ACQUIRE FROM TECUMSEH BRANCH CONNECTING RAILROAD COMPANY AND TO OPERATE, APPROXIMATELY 1.3 MILES OF RAIL LINE IN LENAWEE COUNTY, MI.

    Decision Attachments

68 KB


Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 46 Seconds

Note:
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com.

    Full Text of Decision

36021

40316 SERVICE DATE – OCTOBER 23, 2009

DO

FR-4915-01-P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Finance Docket No. 35035]

Adrian & Blissfield Rail Road Company─Acquisition and Operation Exemption─Tecumseh Branch Connecting Railroad Company

Adrian & Blissfield Rail Road Company (ADBF), a Class III rail carrier, has filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.41 to acquire from Tecumseh Branch Connecting Railroad Company (TCBY) and to operate, approximately 1.3 miles of rail line between milepost 44.2 and milepost 45.5, in the City of Adrian, Lenawee County, MI.

As a result of a transaction between ADBF and TCBY on November 19, 2001, ADBF acquired the rail line as part of a corporate restructuring, but did not file its verified notice of exemption with the Board until October 9, 2009.[1] Thus, the effective date of the exemption is November 8, 2009 (30 days after the exemption is filed).[2]

ADBF certifies that its projected annual revenues as a result of this transaction do not exceed those that would qualify it as a Class III carrier and that its projected annual revenues will not exceed $5 million.

According to ADBF, there is no provision or agreement that may limit future interchange with a third-party connecting carrier.

Pursuant to the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008, Pub. L. No. 110-161,  193, 121 Stat. 1844 (2007), nothing in this decision authorizes the following activities at any solid waste rail transfer facility: collecting, storing or transferring solid waste outside of its original shipping container; or separating or processing solid waste (including baling, crushing, compacting and shredding). The term “solid waste” is defined in section 1004 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, 42 U.S.C. 6903.

If the notice contains false or misleading information, the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke does not automatically stay the effectiveness of the exemption. Petitions for stay must be filed no later than November 2, 2009.

An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB Finance Docket No. 35035, must be filed with the Surface Transportation Board, 395 E Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be served on John D. Heffner, 1750 K Street, NW, Suite 200, Washington, DC 20006.

Board decisions and notices are available on our website at "WWW.STB.DOT.GOV."

Decided: October 20, 2009.

By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of Proceedings.

 

 

Anne K. Quinlan

Acting Secretary

 



[1] ADBF states that eliminating TCBY as a rail carrier through this acquisition will enable ADBF’s owners to restructure their railroad holdings by filing a class exemption notice for continuance in control of three other disconnected short line railroads they control. It appears that ADBF’s owners presently are not authorized to have common control of more than one rail carrier. If that is the case, the Board expects the owners to promptly submit an appropriate filing for authorization for that common control.

[2] The class exemption invoked by ADBF does not provide for retroactive effectiveness.