|SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT|
|WISCONSIN CENTRAL LTD.– DISCONTINUANCE OF SERVICE EXEMPTION –|
IN ASHLAND AND PRICE COUNTIES, WIS.
|Notice Of Exemption|
|Director Of Proceedings|
|PROVIDED NOTICE THAT WISCONSIN CENTRAL LTD. (WCL) FILED A NOTICE OF EXEMPTION TO DISCONTINUE SERVICE OVER A PORTION OF WCL’S ASHLAND SUBDIVISION EXTENDING APPROXIMATELY 58.4 MILES FROM THE CITY OF ASHLAND TO PARK FALLS, WIS.|
| 57 KB|
|Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 40 Seconds|
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com.
|Full Text of Decision|
46661 SERVICE DATE – OCTOBER 18, 2018
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD
[Docket No. AB 303 (Sub-No. 50X)]
Wisconsin Central Ltd.—Discontinuance of Service Exemption—in Ashland and Price Counties, Wis.
Wisconsin Central Ltd. (WCL) has filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 C.F.R. pt. 1152 subpart F–Exempt Abandonments and Discontinuances of Service to discontinue service over a portion of WCL’s Ashland Subdivision extending approximately 58.4 miles from milepost 434.4 in the city of Ashland, Ashland County, Wis., to milepost 376.0 near Park Falls, Price County, Wis. (the Line). The Line traverses United States Postal Service Zip Codes 54806, 54855, 54846, 54546, 54527, 54514, and 54552.
WCL has certified that: (1) no local traffic has moved over the Line for at least two years; (2) there is no overhead traffic to be rerouted over other lines; (3) no formal complaint filed by a user of a rail service on the Line (or by a state or local government entity acting on behalf of such user) regarding cessation of service over the Line is either pending with the Surface Transportation Board (Board) or with any U.S. District Court or has been decided in favor of a complainant within the two-year period; and (4) the requirements at 49 C.F.R. § 1105.12 (newspaper publication) and 49 C.F.R. § 1152.50(d)(1) (notice to governmental agencies) have been met.
As a condition to this exemption, any employee adversely affected by the discontinuance of service shall be protected under Oregon Short Line Railroad—Abandonment Portion Goshen Branch Between Firth & Ammon, in Bingham & Bonneville Counties, Idaho, 360 I.C.C. 91 (1979). To address whether this condition adequately protects affected employees, a petition for partial revocation under 49 U.S.C. § 10502(d) must be filed.
Provided no formal expression of intent to file an offer of financial assistance (OFA) to subsidize continued rail service has been received, this exemption will be effective on November 17, 2018, unless stayed pending reconsideration. Formal expressions of intent to file an OFA to subsidize continued rail service under 49 C.F.R. § 1152.27(c)(2) must be filed by October 26, 2018. Petitions to stay that do not involve environmental issues must be filed by October 29, 2018. Petitions for reconsideration must be filed by November 7, 2018, with the Surface Transportation Board, 395 E Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20423-0001.
A copy of any petition filed with Board should be sent to WCL’s representative, Bradon J. Smith, Fletcher & Sippel LLC, 29 North Wacker Drive, Suite 800, Chicago, IL 60606.
If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, the exemption is void ab initio.
Board decisions and notices are available on our website at
Decided: October 15, 2018.
By the Board, Scott M. Zimmerman, Acting Director, Office of Proceedings.
 The Board modified its OFA procedures effective July 29, 2017. Among other things, the OFA process now requires potential offerors, in their formal expression of intent, to make a preliminary financial responsibility showing based on a calculation using information contained in the carrier’s filing and publicly available information. See Offers of Financial Assistance, EP 729 (STB served June 29, 2017); 82 Fed. Reg. 30,997 (July 5, 2017).
 Each OFA must be accompanied by the filing fee, which currently is set at $1,800. See 49 C.F.R. § 1002.2(f)(25).
 Because this is a discontinuance proceeding and not an abandonment, trail use/rail banking and public use conditions are not appropriate. Because there will be an environmental review during abandonment, this discontinuance does not require environmental review.