SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT
    Decision Information

Docket Number:  
FD_35789_0

Case Title:  
PACIFIC HARBOR LINE, INC.--LEASE AND OPERATION EXEMPTION--UNON PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY

Decision Type:  
Decision

Deciding Body:  
Director Of Proceedings

    Decision Summary

Decision Notes:  
DECISION CLARIFIED THE LANGUAGE IN A NOTICE OF EXEMPTION SERVED AND PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER ON MAY 23, 2014, IN THIS PROCEEDING.

    Decision Attachments

74 KB



Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 55 Seconds

Note:
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com.

    Full Text of Decision

43917                                       SERVICE DATE – JULY 18, 2014

DO

 

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD

 

NOTICE

 

Docket No. FD 35789

 

PACIFIC HARBOR LINE, INC.—LEASE AND OPERATION EXEMPTION—UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY

 

                                                                                                July 14, 2014

 

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES:

 

           

On May 23, 2014, notice of the above exemption was served and published in the Federal Register (79 Fed. Reg. 29,839).  The exemption became effective on June 29, 2014.  In a letter received on May 27, 2014, Pacific Harbor Line, Inc. (PHL) advised the Board that the last sentence in the third paragraph that reads:  “PHL states that, under the terms of the lease, UP will retain the exclusive common carrier obligation to provide service over the line,” was incorrectly stated. 

 

PHL requests that a notice be published in the Federal Register clarifying that the lease between PHL and UP grants operating rights to PHL limited to:  (1) the pick-up and set-out and handling of rail cars being moved in switch service by PHL on behalf of UP; and (2) switching and storage of rail cars (including without limitation spotting and picking up loaded and empty rail cars at customers that can be served from the line).  According to PHL, all such services performed by PHL over the line shall be exclusively for UP and the customers served on the line and that UP will retain the exclusive common carrier obligation to handle other types of traffic on the line.  PHL also states that the lease does not contain an interchange commitment with respect to the operations that PHL has the common carrier obligation to perform.  All other information in the notice is correct.

 

            Please revise your copies accordingly.  A correction will be published in the Federal Register, and the notice otherwise remains unchanged.

 

 

Rachel D. Campbell

Director, Office of Proceedings