|SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT|
|DULUTH, WINNIPEG AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY--AMENDED TRACKAGE RIGHTS EXEMPTION--DULUTH, MISSABE AND IRON RANGE RAILWAY COMPANY|
|DECISION GRANTED THE MOTION TO CONTINUE TO HOLD CONSIDERATION OF THE PETITION TO REVOKE IN THESE PROCEEDINGS IN ABEYANCE UNTIL APRIL 14, 2008.|
|FD_35046_0 - Duluth, Missabe And Iron Range Railway Company--Amended Trackage Rights Exemption--Duluth, Winnipeg And Pacific Railway Company|
FD_35047_0 - Wisconsin Central Ltd. -Trackage Rights Exemption-Duluth, Missabe And Iron Range Railway Company
FD_35048_0 - Wisconsin Central Ltd.--Trackage Rights Exemption--Duluth, Winnipeg And Pacific Railway Company
FD_35049_0 - Duluth, Missabe And Iron Range Railway Company--Trackage Rights Exemption--Wisconsin Central Ltd.
FD_35050_0 - Duluth, Winnipeg And Pacific Railway Company--Trackage Rights Exemption--Wisconsin Central Ltd.
| 9 KB|
|Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 18 Seconds|
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com.
|Full Text of Decision|
38811 SERVICE DATE – LATE RELEASE FEBRUARY 14, 2008
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD
STB Finance Docket No. 35045
STB Finance Docket No. 35046
STB Finance Docket No. 35047
LTD.—TRACKAGE RIGHTS EXEMPTION—
STB Finance Docket No. 35048
LTD.—TRACKAGE RIGHTS EXEMPTION—
STB Finance Docket No. 35049
STB Finance Docket No. 35050
Decided: February 14, 2008
On July 23, 2007, United Transportation Union (UTU) filed a petition to revoke the six exemptions noticed in these proceedings on June 29, 2007. UTU contends that the sole purpose of the exemptions was to circumvent existing collective bargaining agreements. The exemptions became effective on July 14, 2007.
In a decision served on August 15, 2007, the Board granted the joint motion of Wisconsin Central Ltd., Duluth, Winnipeg and Pacific Railway Company, and Duluth, Missabe and Iron Range Railway Company (collectively, CN) requesting that UTU’s petition to revoke in these proceedings be held in abeyance for 60 days to October 15, 2007, to give the parties time to negotiate a resolution of the issues raised in the petition. At CN’s request, the Board, in decisions served on October 11, 2007, and December 7, 2007, respectively, granted additional motions to hold the petition to revoke in these proceedings in abeyance for additional 60-day periods, to December 14, 2007, and then to February 12, 2008.
On February 12, 2008, CN filed a further motion requesting that the Board continue to hold these proceedings in abeyance for an additional 60 days. CN states that the parties have not yet reached, but have agreed to continue over the next 60 days to work toward reaching, an agreement on the matters raised in UTU’s petition to revoke. CN states that UTU concurs in the request.
The request is reasonable and consistent with the Board’s preference for private-sector negotiation and resolution of disputes. Therefore, this request will be granted.
This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the human environment or the conservation of energy resources.
It is ordered:
1. The motion to continue to hold consideration of the petition to revoke in these proceedings in abeyance for an additional 60 days is granted.
2. The due date for CN to reply to UTU’s petition to revoke in these proceedings is extended to April 14, 2008.
3. This decision is effective on the date of service.
By the Board, Anne K. Quinlan, Acting Secretary.
Anne K. Quinlan