SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT  
Decision Information  
Docket Number:  EP_290_5  
Case Title:  QUARTERLY RAIL COST ADJUSTMENT FACTOR  
Decision Type:  Decision  
Deciding Body:  Entire Board  
Decision Summary  
Decision Notes:  DECISION APPROVED RAIL COST ADJUSTMENT FACTOR (RCAF) INDICES SUBMITTED BY THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RAILROADS TO THE BOARD FOR THE SECOND QUARTER OF 2012.  
Decision Attachments  
113 KB  
Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 68 Seconds  
Note: If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com.  
Full Text of Decision  
42270 SERVICE DATE – MARCH 20, 2012 EB
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD
DECISION
Docket No. EP 290 (SubNo. 5) (20122)
QUARTERLY RAIL COST ADJUSTMENT FACTOR
Digest:^{[1]} The rail cost adjustment factor (RCAF) is an index formulated to represent changes in railroad costs incurred by the nation’s largest railroads over a specified period of time. The statute requires the Surface Transportation Board (Board) to publish the RCAF on at least a quarterly basis. Each quarter, the Association of American Railroads computes three types of RCAF figures and submits those figures to the Board for approval. The Board has reviewed the submission and adopts the RCAF figures for the second quarter of 2012.
Decided: March 19, 2012
In Railroad Cost Recovery Procedures, 1 I.C.C. 2d 207 (1984), the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) outlined the procedures for calculating the allinclusive index of railroad input prices and the method for computing the rail cost adjustment factor (RCAF). Under the procedures, the Association of American Railroads (AAR) is required to calculate the index on a quarterly basis and submit it on the fifth day of the last month of each calendar quarter. In Railroad Cost Recovery Procedures—Productivity Adjustment, 5 I.C.C. 2d 434 (1989), aff’d sub nom. Edison Electric Institute v. ICC, 969 F.2d 1221 (D.C. Cir. 1992), the ICC adopted procedures that require the adjustment of the quarterly index for a measure of productivity.
The provisions of 49 U.S.C. § 10708 direct the Surface Transportation Board (Board) to continue to publish both an unadjusted RCAF and a productivityadjusted RCAF. In Productivity Adjustment—Implementation, 1 S.T.B. 739 (1996), the Board decided to publish a second productivityadjusted RCAF called the RCAF5. Consequently, three indices are now filed with the Board: the RCAF (Unadjusted), the RCAF (Adjusted), and the RCAF5. The RCAF (Unadjusted) is an index reflecting cost changes experienced by the railroad industry, without reference to changes in rail productivity. The RCAF (Adjusted) is an index that reflects national average productivity changes as originally developed and applied by the ICC, the calculation of which is currently based on a 5year moving average. The RCAF5 is an index that also reflects national average productivity changes; however, those productivity changes are calculated as if a 5year moving average had been applied consistently from the productivity adjustment’s inception in 1989.
The index of railroad input prices, RCAF (Unadjusted), RCAF (Adjusted), and RCAF5 for the second quarter 2012 are shown in Table A of the Appendix to this decision. Table B shows the fourth quarter 2011 index and the RCAF calculated on both an actual and a forecasted basis. The difference between the actual calculation and the forecasted calculation is the forecast error adjustment.
We have examined AAR’s calculations and we find that AAR has complied with our procedures. We find that the second quarter 2012 RCAF (Unadjusted) is 1.185, an increase of 1.4% from the first quarter 2012 RCAF of 1.169. The RCAF (Adjusted) is calculated, in part, using the RCAF (Unadjusted) and a 5year moving geometric average of productivity change for U.S. Class I railroads from 20062010, which is 1.008 (0.8% per year). We find the RCAF (Adjusted) is 0.520, an increase of 1.2% from the previously reported first quarter 2012 RCAF (Adjusted) of 0.514.^{[2]}
In accordance with Productivity Adjustment—Implementation, 1 S.T.B. at 74849, the RCAF5 for this quarter will use a productivity trend for the years 20052009, which is 1.014 (1.4% per year). We find the RCAF5 for the second quarter of 2012 is 0.492, an increase of 0.8% from the previously reported first quarter 2012 RCAF5 of 0.488.^{[3]}
This decision will not significantly affect the quality of the human environment or the conservation of energy resources.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. § 10708.
It is ordered:
1. The Board has approved the second quarter 2012 RCAF (Unadjusted) of 1.185, RCAF (Adjusted) of 0.520, and RCAF5 of 0.492.
2. Notice of this decision will be published in the Federal Register.
3. The effective date of this decision is April 1, 2012.
By the Board, Chairman Elliott, Vice Chairman Mulvey, and Commissioner Begeman.
APPENDIX
TABLE A
EP 290 (SubNo. 5) (20122) All Inclusive Index of Railroad Input Costs (Endnotes Following Table B)
TABLE B
EP 290 (SubNo. 5) (20122) Comparison of Fourth Quarter 2011 Index Calculated on Both a Forecasted and an Actual Basis
Endnotes: ^{[1]} The digest constitutes no part of the decision of the Board but has been prepared for the convenience of the reader. It may not be cited to or relied upon as precedent. Policy Statement on Plain Language Digests in Decisions, EP 696 (STB served Sept. 2, 2010). ^{[2]} The second quarter 2012 RCAF Adjusted (0.520) is calculated by dividing the second quarter 2012 RCAF Unadjusted (1.185) by the second quarter productivity adjustment factor of 2.2769. The second quarter 2012 productivity adjustment factor is calculated by multiplying the first quarter 2012 productivity adjustment of 2.2724 by the fourth root (1.0020) of the 20062010 annual average productivity growth rate of 0.8%. ^{[3]} The second quarter 2012 RCAF5 (0.492) is calculated by dividing the second quarter 2012 RCAF Unadjusted (1.185) by the second quarter productivity adjustment factor5 (PAF5) of 2.4062. The second quarter 2012 PAF5 is calculated by multiplying the first quarter 2012 PAF5 of 2.3978 by the fourth root (1.0035) of the 20052009 annual average productivity growth rate of 1.4%. ^{[1]} “Other Items” is a combination of Purchased Services, Casualties and Insurance, General and Administrative, Other Taxes, Loss and Damage, and Special Charges, price changes for all of which are measured by the Producer Price Index for Industrial Commodities Less Fuel and Related Products and Power.
^{[2]} Linking is necessitated by a change to the 2010 weights beginning in the fourth quarter 2011. The following formula was used for the current quarter’s index:
2nd Qr. 2012 Index (2010 Weights) Times 1st Quarter Linked Index Equals Linked Index 1st Qr. 2012 Index (1980 = 100 Linked) (Current Quarter) (2010 Weights) Or 306.0 X 289.2 = 296.7 298.3
^{[3]} The first quarter 2008 RCAF was rebased using the October 1, 2007, level of 245.9 in accordance with the requirements of the Staggers Rail Act of 1980 (10/1/2007 = 100).
^{[4]} The second quarter 2012 forecast error adjustment was calculated as follows: (a) fourth quarter 2011 RCAF using forecasted data equals 118.2; (b) fourth quarter 2011 RCAF using actual data equals 116.0; and (c) the difference equals the forecast error (ba) of 2.2. Because the actual fourth quarter value is less than the forecast value, the difference is subtracted from the Preliminary RCAF.
